We began the year knowing that it would be very challenging financially. In the 2021 Budget Town Hall Meeting in November, we discussed the following:
- Managing Agent Financial Audit
- Capital Contributions and Administrative Fees
We have made excellent progress in each of these areas.
The Managing Agent Financial Audit began on May 17th and will conclude at the end of August. At that point in time, the Board of Directors (BOD) will receive an Audit Report which will be posted on the website.
Capital Contributions and Administrative Fees collected at closings for new sales and resales have been deposited in our Operating Savings Account. This has allowed us maximum flexibility to address incremental expenses not identified in the Adopted Budget. In the first six months of the year, a number of unbudgeted expenditures have been required (Note: some projects have been approved for completion but are not yet started):
- Legal expenses associated with the rewrite/revision of our Governing Documents (originally anticipated to begin in late 2021/early 2022)
- Need for two pool lifeguards to address Covid-19 Requirements
- Consulting Services to assist the BOD in formulating the 2022 Budget
- Playground Site improvements to address drainage, landscape screening for slide
- Tree removal in Roper Park
- Employment of an Independent Engineering Firm to inspect assets planned to be transferred from the Developer to the Association
The Village Walk irrigation system is being mapped with the direct involvement of the builder Eagle Construction and significant progress has been made. We are currently spending less in this area than Budgeted.
Major Association Assets identified in the 2019 Replacement Reserve Study, will require repair and replacement earlier than planned. Major items that have already been or must be addressed are:
- Refurbishment of the pool pergola which was completed before the pool opening.
- A complete resurfacing of the pool as well as caulking, filter recharging and skimmer replacements. The resurfacing is set to begin in the September/October time frame. This is two years earlier than planned.
As you can see, the BOD has been very busy addressing a large number of issues, all of which have a financial impact.
A standing-room-only audience crowded into 101 Mounts Bay Road on July 13 for the James City County Board of Supervisors meeting, during which one of the main topics was a potential development connecting New Town to Commonwealth-owned land that is part of Eastern State Hospital.
Recently, Atlantic Builders of Virginia, which has an option to purchase part of the 400-acre lot, made a request for parcels C-1 and C-2 to be rezoned from public use to mixed use. The James City County Planning Commission approved the request by a vote of 5-2, opening the possibility of a commercial and residential development.
ABVA is proposing that access to a development encompassing approximately 85 homes be routed down Discovery Park Boulevard – and that the new development become part of New Town and its residential and commercial associations.
In a room occupied largely by New Town residents, at least five members stood before the Board to voice their concerns and disapproval for ABVA’s hoped-for plan. The Board indicated at the start that it did not intend to take any action that night, nor would it for an undetermined period of time.
Dick Durst, president of the New Town Residential Homeowners Association, spoke on behalf of the Association’s Board of Directors.
“Our first request is to leave the current land-use designation as it is; that is federal, state and county land,” Durst said. “We are very concerned about the environmental and logistical impact that such a large volume of homes could be built on this property, as well as the demands this will place on our infrastructure and the resulting increase in traffic on our already crowded roads and streets.
“Second, the New Town Residential Association and our members were never consulted by ABVA with a request to add New Town to the mixed-use request. We have not had adequate time to discuss positives or negatives by adding the volume of these homes to our Association.”
Resident Stuart Dopp explained that in addition to vehicular traffic, New Town is a haven for walkers¸ runners, cyclists, dog walkers, all of whom would incur increased danger from the type of additional traffic construction vehicles and, ultimately, residential traffic to the new development would present.
Initially, ABVA’s proposal would route construction and other traffic down Olive Drive and Discovery Park Boulevard. However, ABVA subsequently sent a letter to Durst and Jamestown District Supervisor Jim Icenhour walking back the proposal to use Olive Drive.
However, New Town resident Mark Newcomb pointed out that the letter was unsigned and under no letterhead.
“As an attorney, that means not much to me, just a piece of paper,” Newcomb said. “Our request is that before you approve the development . . . you get some kind of commitment in terms of a contract from ABVA so that they will develop what they present to you and not seek an extension beyond that so that we can protect the character and the ‘calm,’ if you will, of the neighborhood.”
Vernon Geddy, attorney for ABVA, emphasized that he would “publicly state to the Board” that the commitment ABVA made in its letter not to use Olive Drive was firm, and was based on responses received from New Town residents at the first of two recent Town Hall meetings.
In fact, he said, he has ben asked to draft a deed to convey to the Association a piece of property ABVA owns in that area that could be used for traffic.
“There will be no vehicular traffic through the Charlotte Park neighborhood,” he promised.
Geddy also reiterated that their proposal is “nothing but conceptual, not a detailed plan” because none of the (many) studies that will be done to determine the full impact of the project have not been done.
“We’d very much like to get to that stage,” he said. “We think this could be a win-win for the neighbors, the developer, the county and the Commonwealth.”
Finally, Geddy asked that “New Town” be removed from the title of the proposal, and that it be renamed “Eastern State.”
The Board of Supervisors did not take action on the proposed revisions to the Comprehensive Plan. Rather as announced at the outset by Chairman Hipple, the Board used the hearing as a listening session to take in input that can be used in further deliberations and work sessions on the final plan. Stay tuned!